Once the marriage between the complainant and the petitioner has been annulled, the continuance of further proceedings against the petitioner unfair.
Anmol Kahlon @ Anmol Kaur vs State of Punjab & another
Punjab and Haryana HC
CRM-M No.21333 of 2008
About/from the judgment:
The FIR has arisen due to differences between the brother of the petitioner and his wife. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued (which is not disputed) that the complainant is married to the brother of the petitioner and, since he was a permanent resident of America left India within two months. He further argues that the petitioner is unmarried sister and question for entrustment of any property to her would normally not arise. He has further argued that by now marriage between the complainant & the brother of the petitioner has been annulled and thus, the continuance of further proceedings against the petitioner at least is illegal and unfair.
Read the Judgment
Knowledge and content of about almost all their respective descriptions are borrowed from law-related blogs and websites, we, therefore, wish to give proper credit to all the respective law-related blogs and websites like LiveLaw, Bar and Bench, LatestLaws, PathLegal, FirstLaw, Lawctopus, IndianKanoon, Manupatra, LegallyIndia etc.. Many of the judgments are also taken from them websites of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other respective Hon'ble High Courts!