Irretrievable break down is not a ground to grant divorce in a contested action

Mukul Roy Vs Samar Bijoy Roy

Calcutta HC

30/01/2019

F.A.T 638 of 2015

About/from the judgment:

“In the absence of legislation irretrievable break down of marriage cannot be held to be a valid ground for dissolution of the marital tie. The same will set a very bad precedent and will give rise to a dangerous trend in the society. Unwilling or erring partners without any fault of the other partner will proceed before the Court for obtaining divorce on the said ground.”

 

A Division bench of Calcutta High Court gave a split verdict in an appeal filed by a woman against a district court order granting divorce to her husband on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

 

The District court, though found that the cruelty as urged by the man is not proved, had granted divorce on the ground that the marriage between the parties is irretrievably broken down.

 

In the appeal, the bench comprising Justice IP Mukerji and Justice Amrita Sinha observed that that irretrievable break down is not a ground to grant divorce in a contested action. Justice Mukerji upheld the lower court order holding that there was sufficient mental torture which entitled the husband to obtain divorce, while Justice Amrita opined that the mental cruelty is not proved in this case and that irretrievable break down of marriage cannot be held to be a valid ground for dissolution of the marital tie.

 

Justice Amrita said that granting divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown will set a very bad precedent and will give rise to a dangerous trend in the society. The judge said:

 

"In the absence of legislation irretrievable break down of marriage cannot be held to be a valid ground for dissolution of the marital tie. The same will set a very bad precedent and will give rise to a dangerous trend in the society. Unwilling or erring partners without any fault of the other partner will proceed before the Court for obtaining divorce on the said ground. It is true that in modern time difference of opinion, culture, taste etc. often leads to acrimonious relationship in between the parties. Obtaining divorce by paying a price has become a common phenomenon but the same is possible only if both the parties mutually agree to the same. In the absence of mutual consent divorce can be granted only on the grounds as mentioned in the Act and not otherwise."

 

Justice Mukerji held that the wife had inflicted mental torture on the husband. The judge noted that most of the pleading in the plaint filed by husband is about refusal of sex by the wife. The husband had alleged that the wife completely refused to have physical relationship with him from the year 2001. The judge said:"There is evidence to suggest that from 2001 the respondent/husband had been requesting his wife to be physically proximate with him, which she repeatedly denied to him. This more than anything was sufficient mental torture which entitled the husband to divorce."

 

On this aspect of 'cruelty', Justice Amrita had a different opinion. The Judge said:"The husband himself is at fault by deserting the appellant wife and has claimed relief of divorce. It is he who inflicted mental cruelty to the appellant wife by leaving her alone and making all sorts of filthy allegations against her. The Court below disbelieved the evidences given against the appellant wife. It is very gracious on the part of the wife who inspite of all the allegations made against her is ready and willing to perform her marital duties. Law does not entitle a person to take advantage of his own wrong."

Read the Judgment

Knowledge and content of about almost all their respective descriptions are borrowed from law-related blogs and websites, we, therefore, wish to give proper credit to all the respective law-related blogs and websites like LiveLaw, Bar and Bench, LatestLaws, PathLegal, FirstLaw, Lawctopus, IndianKanoon, Manupatra, LegallyIndia etc.. Many of the judgments are also taken from them websites of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other respective Hon'ble High Courts!

Formats for use
Please reload

Talk to our volunteer on our #Helpline

8882-498-498

Single Helpline Number For Men In Distress In India

Join our mailing list!  Stay up-to-date on upcoming projects, offers & events.

  • Follow Daaman on Facebook
  • Follow Daaman on Twitter

©2018-2020 Daaman Welfare Society & Trust.

All rights reserved.

Beware, anyone can be a victim of gender bias in society and laws! 

Don't wait: Schedule a conversation with a trusted, experienced Men's Rights Activist to find out how only awareness is the key to fight and remove prevailing gender bias against men in society.