High Court cannot adjudicate correctness of allegations in FIR in Article 226 proceedings
Padma Mishra Vs State of Uttarakhand and Anr
Criminal Appeal No. 20/2010
About/from the judgment:
The Supreme Court has observed that, writ jurisdiction of the High Court cannot be invoked to adjudicate the correctness of the allegations in an FIR.
The court said that the intervention can only be in exceptional cases, if the allegations made in the FIR ex facie do not disclose any offence at all.
The Court was considering the appeal against the order of the High Court of Uttarakhand dismissing a writ petition for quashing of an FIR instituted against the petitioner under Sections 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities(Prevention)Act,1986.
Perusing the FIR, the bench noted that it contains the allegation that the appellant and others are taking recourse to public threats and coercion including physical violence to gang the voices of witnesses in cases against them. While dismissing the appeal, the bench said:
"In proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the High Court does not adjudicate the correctness of the allegations in an FIR. The Court may only intervene in exceptional cases, if the allegations made in the FIR ex facie do not disclose any offence at all. In our considered opinion, the High Court rightly refused to quash the FIR under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and dismissed the writ petition."
Read the Judgment
Knowledge and content of about almost all their respective descriptions are borrowed from law-related blogs and websites, we, therefore, wish to give proper credit to all the respective law-related blogs and websites like LiveLaw, Bar and Bench, LatestLaws, PathLegal, FirstLaw, Lawctopus, IndianKanoon, Manupatra, LegallyIndia etc.. Many of the judgments are also taken from them websites of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other respective Hon'ble High Courts!