Medical of acused stated 'there was no erection or no ejaculation', FIR quashed u/s 376, 342 and 506(2) IPC

Shivlal Jerambhai Padia vs State of Gujarat & ors

Gujarat HC



About/from the judgment:

FIR quashed u/s 376, 342 and 506(2) IPC


A team of doctors at the Civil Hospital tried to collect the semen sample by electrovibratory method for three times. It has been very specifically noted in the certificate that there was no erection or no ejaculation.


In the FIR as well as in the statement of the prosecutorix recorded under Section164 of the Cr.P.C., there are specific allegations that she was overpowered by the accused and was forcibly raped. These allegations stand falsified by the evidence on record.

Read the Judgment

Knowledge and content of about almost all their respective descriptions are borrowed from law-related blogs and websites, we, therefore, wish to give proper credit to all the respective law-related blogs and websites like LiveLaw, Bar and Bench, LatestLaws, PathLegal, FirstLaw, Lawctopus, IndianKanoon, Manupatra, LegallyIndia etc.. Many of the judgments are also taken from them websites of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other respective Hon'ble High Courts!

Formats for use

Talk to our volunteer on our #Helpline


Single Helpline Number For Men In Distress In India

Join our mailing list!  Stay up-to-date on upcoming projects, offers & events.

  • Follow Daaman on Facebook
  • Follow Daaman on Twitter

©2018-2020 Daaman Welfare Society & Trust.

All rights reserved.

Beware, anyone can be a victim of gender bias in society and laws! 

Don't wait: Schedule a conversation with a trusted, experienced Men's Rights Activist to find out how only awareness is the key to fight and remove prevailing gender bias against men in society.