Possibility of romantic love going wrong is there - Bail allowed to man accused of raping 16 yr old girl
Shri Karan Vs State of Himachal Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh HC
Cr.MP(M) No.2013 of 2020
About/from the judgment:
"Given the conduct of the victim of her voluntarily leaving her home under the pretext of fetching water from the water source and fact that the accused is also unmarried, the possibility of romantic love going wrong is there", remarked the HC while granting bail to a 21-year-old man accused of raping a 16-year-old girl.
The Court was hearing a regular bail plea of a 21-year-old accused who alleged that the family of the girl forced her to lodge a false complaint to break their love affair.
The police arrested the petitioner on 2.9.2020, in FIR No.107 of 2020, registered under Section 376, 363 and 366A of Indian Penal Code, 1860, (IPC), and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offices, Act, 2012 (POCSO Act), in Police Station Dharampur, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh.
Facts of the Case
On 1st September, 2020, the father of the victim gave a written report to the police alleging that his daughter aged 16 years was missing since 31st August, 2020.
He further told the SHO that the victim had gone to fetch water from 'Baudi', which is at 100 meters. distance but she did not return home. The family conducted a frantic search but could not trace her.
On verifying one phone, which belongs to the mother of the complainant, i.e., grandmother of the victim, they noticed one phone call. When the complainant called back on the said number, it was switched off.
However, they came to know from inquiries that the phone belongs to Karan-petitioner herein. Thus the complainant suspected that Karan had allured his daughter and had run away with her. Thereafter, the Accused was arrested.
Arguments put forth
The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the victim and the petitioner belong to adjacent villages and are known to each other from childhood and it is a case of romantic love and not of rape and that incarceration before the proof of guilt would cause grave injustice to the petitioner and family.
On the other hand, while opposing the bail, the Additional Advocate General submitted that since the victim is a minor, as such there is no question of consent.
The Court in its order noted,
"Although the victim is aged 16 years but simultaneously, the accused is also aged 21 years and both of them are the residents of adjacent villages. Given the conduct of the victim of her voluntarily leaving her home under the pretext of fetching water from the water source and fact that the accused is also unmarried, the possibility of romantic love going wrong is there."
The Court further said,
"An analysis of entire evidence does not justify further incarceration of the accused, nor is going to achieve any significant purpose. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the stage of the investigation and the period of incarceration already undergone would make out a case for bail."
In related news, the Himachal Pradesh High Court on Wednesday (11th November) granted bail to a man accused of 'raping' a minor girl on the ground that the girl had consented to the sexual intercourse.
"Although, she could not have consented for sexual intercourse as well as leaving custody of her custodian but for deciding the bail, her conduct is sufficient to grant bail to the petitioner", the Court observed.
Read the Judgment
Knowledge and content of about almost all their respective descriptions are borrowed from law-related blogs and websites, we, therefore, wish to give proper credit to all the respective law-related blogs and websites like LiveLaw, Bar and Bench, LatestLaws, PathLegal, FirstLaw, Lawctopus, IndianKanoon, Manupatra, LegallyIndia etc.. Many of the judgments are also taken from them websites of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other respective Hon'ble High Courts!