Divorce By Mutual Consent Is A Secular Concept; Six-Month Cooling-Off Period Can Be Waived For Christians As Well

Tomy Joseph vs Smitha Tomy

Kerala HC

26/10/2018

OP (FC).No. 577 of 2018

About/from the judgment:

“The dictum laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh (supra) would be applicable in case of a petition filed under Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869, also.”

 

Waiving ‘cooling-off’ time for divorce for a Christian couple, the High Court of Kerala observed that divorce by mutual consent is a secular concept and there can be no discrimination on the ground of religion against persons who want divorce by mutual consent.

 

The family court had dismissed a petition seeking to waive the 6-month period for making the second move for divorce under Section 10A of Divorce Act, the law applicable to Christians. The court had also observed that there is no provision in the Divorce Act to waive the 6-month period also. Challenging this order, the couple moved the high court.

 

The bench comprising Justice CK Abdul Rehim and Justice R Narayana Pisharadi, in Tomy Joseph vs. Smitha Tomy, observed that only substantial difference between the law applicable to Hindus and Christians is that, instead of the period of one year mentioned in Section 13 B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Section 28(1) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, a period of two years of separate residence is provided under Section 10A(1) of the Divorce Act, 1869.

 

Referring to Amardeep Singh vs. Harveen Kaur, the bench observed that the dictum laid down in the said case would be applicable in case of a petition filed under Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869, also. The bench said: “When the Apex Court has declared the law that the “cooling off period” of six months provided under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is not mandatory but directory and such period can be allowed to be waived by the court on satisfaction of certain conditions, denying that benefit to persons who are governed by the Divorce Act, 1869 would amount to unjust discrimination.”

 

Allowing the ‘cooling off’, the bench added: “The view taken by us that, divorce by mutual consent is a secular concept and there can be no discrimination on the ground of religion against persons who want divorce by mutual consent, is fortified by the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Saumya Ann Thomas v. The Union of India: 2010 (1) KLT 869 wherein it has been held that the period of ‘two years’ stipulated in Section 10A(1) of the Divorce Act, 1869, being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, must be read down as a period of ‘one year’.”

Read the Judgment

Knowledge and content of about almost all their respective descriptions are borrowed from law-related blogs and websites, we, therefore, wish to give proper credit to all the respective law-related blogs and websites like LiveLaw, Bar and Bench, LatestLaws, PathLegal, FirstLaw, Lawctopus, IndianKanoon, Manupatra, LegallyIndia etc.. Many of the judgments are also taken from them websites of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other respective Hon'ble High Courts!

Formats for use
Please reload

Talk to our volunteer on our #Helpline

8882-498-498

Single Helpline Number For Men In Distress In India

Join our mailing list!  Stay up-to-date on upcoming projects, offers & events.

  • Follow Daaman on Facebook
  • Follow Daaman on Twitter

©2018-2020 Daaman Welfare Society & Trust.

All rights reserved.

Beware, anyone can be a victim of gender bias in society and laws! 

Don't wait: Schedule a conversation with a trusted, experienced Men's Rights Activist to find out how only awareness is the key to fight and remove prevailing gender bias against men in society.