The FIR has arisen due to differences between the brother of the petitioner and his wife. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued (which is not disputed) that the complainant is married to the brother of the petitioner and, since he was a permanent resident of America left India within two months. He further argues that the petitioner is unmarried sister and question for entrustment of any property to her would normally not arise. He has further argued that by now marriage between the complainant & the brother of the petitioner has been annulled and thus, the continuance of further proceedings against the petitioner at least is illegal and unfair.