top of page

Section 498A misuse continuing - "poor relatives" of husband staying separately also roped in

Section 498A misuse continuing - "poor relatives" of husband staying separately also roped in

Jyoti Ganesh Patil Vs State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC

08/07/2022

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 440 OF 2022

About/from the judgment:

The High Court voiced its concern over the trend of roping in the relatives of a husband in cases of cruelty and domestic violence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

The Court, while quashing domestic violence proceedings against one Jyoti Patil, noted that she was living far away from the husband of the complainant-wife and yet was named as an accused just because she happened to be the accused husband's relative.

"Time and again, this Court as well as the Supreme Court has observed that it is a fashion to array all the relatives of the husband as respondents or to make them as an accused in a complaint under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and it shows the misuse of the proceedings of law, still the instances have not reduced. Such poor relatives, who were never staying with the husband, cannot be asked to face the proceedings on some stray statements about the domestic violence. Therefore, the application deserves to be allowed," the Court said in the order.

"Poor relatives, who were never staying with the husband, cannot be asked to face the proceedings on some stray statements about the domestic violence." - Bombay High Court

The Court was hearing a plea filed by Patil seeking to quash and set aside the criminal proceedings initiated against her by her sister-in-law.

The complainant-wife had alleged that her in-laws and Patil had been torturing her and subjecting her to domestic violence.

However, the Court noted that the complainant in her complaint itself, had stated that her in-laws lived in Pune and Patil lived in Bhusawal, where she was serving as a veterinarian.

"When she herself had given the address of the in-laws of Pune and then gives address of the applicant of Bhusawal, then, it was incumbent upon the aggrieved person (complainant) to satisfy as to what point of time the applicant and she herself were staying in the shared household after the marriage. When these basic pleadings are lacking and the documents on record are supporting the address given by the aggrieved person of a different place, then, a case is made out to invoke the inherent powers of this Court to quash the entire proceedings against the applicant," the Court opined.

The court further said that the applicant cannot be arrayed as an accused, in view of the fact that she was residing at a different place and it was unlikely that she would have indulged in any acts of domestic violence against the aggrieved person.

"Therefore, the applicant cannot be asked to face the proceedings," the court held.

In this backdrop, the court quashed the proceedings.

Read the Judgment

Download

Knowledge and content of about almost all their respective descriptions are borrowed from law-related blogs and websites, we, therefore, wish to give proper credit to all the respective law-related blogs and websites like LiveLaw, Bar and Bench, LatestLaws, PathLegal, FirstLaw, Lawctopus, IndianKanoon, Manupatra, LegallyIndia etc.. Many of the judgments are also taken from them websites of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other respective Hon'ble High Courts!

Talk to our volunteer on our #Helpline

8882-498-498

Single Helpline Number For Men In Distress In India

Join our mailing list!  Stay up-to-date on upcoming projects, offers & events.

Thanks for subscribing! Welcome to Daaman!

  • Follow Daaman on Facebook
  • Follow Daaman on Twitter

©2018-2020 Daaman Welfare Society & Trust.

All rights reserved.

Beware, anyone can be a victim of gender bias in society and laws! 

Don't wait: Schedule a conversation with a trusted, experienced Men's Rights Activist to find out how only awareness is the key to fight and remove prevailing gender bias against men in society.
bottom of page