top of page
Promoting Harmony
Daaman
Non-Mentioning Of Accused’s Name In FIR Not A Ground To Doubt Its Contents
Latesh @ Dadu Baburao Karlekar vs The State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court
30/01/2018
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1301 OF 2015
About/from the judgment:
Non-Mentioning Of Accused’s Name In FIR Not A Ground To Doubt Its Contents!
Some times in the state of shock, they (the witness) may miss the important details, because people tend to react differently when they come across a violent act, the bench said.
When a person gives a statement to the police officer, basing on which the FIR is registered[,] [t]he capacity of reproducing the things differs from person to person. Some people may have the ability to reproduce the things as it is, some may lack the ability to do so. Some times in the state of shock, they may miss the important details, because people tend to react differently when they come across a violent act.
Read the Judgment
Knowledge and content of about almost all their respective descriptions are borrowed from law-related blogs and websites, we, therefore, wish to give proper credit to all the respective law-related blogs and websites like LiveLaw, Bar and Bench, LatestLaws, PathLegal, FirstLaw, Lawctopus, IndianKanoon, Manupatra, LegallyIndia etc.. Many of the judgments are also taken from them websites of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other respective Hon'ble High Courts!
Formats for use
bottom of page