top of page
Promoting Harmony
Daaman
Prosecution for offence under sec 182 IPC without formal complaint by public servant void ab initio

Saloni Arora Vs State of NCT of Delhi
Supreme Court
10/01/2017
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.64 of 2017
About/from the judgment:
The Supreme Court has reiterated that in order to prosecute an accused for an offence punishable under Section 182 IPC, it is mandatory to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 195 of the Code else such action is rendered void ab initio.
A court observed that such a position is settled in the case of Daulat Ram vs. State of Punjab, and set aside a high court judgment, which had directed the Registrar General to make a formal complaint for prosecution under Section 182 of the Indian Penal Code.
Section 182 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the offence of giving false information with an intent to cause a public servant use his lawful power to the injury of another person. Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code deals with procedure for prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence.
In Daulat Ram case, the apex court had held that the complaint must be in writing by the public servant concerned, and without that, trial for the offence under Section 182 IPC is without jurisdiction ab initio.
Read the Judgment
Knowledge and content of about almost all their respective descriptions are borrowed from law-related blogs and websites, we, therefore, wish to give proper credit to all the respective law-related blogs and websites like LiveLaw, Bar and Bench, LatestLaws, PathLegal, FirstLaw, Lawctopus, IndianKanoon, Manupatra, LegallyIndia etc.. Many of the judgments are also taken from them websites of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other respective Hon'ble High Courts!
Formats for use
bottom of page